Job creators…

If I were to look at a list of the richest people in America, I could guarantee that none of them created my job. No. My current job was created by an immigrant who came to this country about 20 years ago from Soviet Russia. It’s very American dream, if you ask me. Before this job, my job was created by a small family who ran a newspaper.

My point is this, according statistics by the Small Business Administration, small business have created 64 percent of net new jobs over the past 15 years. While small businesses do get tax breaks, I doubt they’re in the same stratosphere as the breaks the super-wealthy receive.

According to Warren Buffet’s recent editorial, he paid a lower percentage than the other 20 people in his office. He has also said that he pays less in taxes than his maid. Obama, Buffet and others have come up with a rather ingenious solution: close tax loopholes and raise taxes on the wealthiest one percent. This has been deemed “Class warfare.” And the super-rich are now called “Job creators.” I’ll let the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway take that one:

Back in the 1980s and 1990s, tax rates for the rich were far higher, and my percentage rate was in the middle of the pack. According to a theory I sometimes hear, I should have thrown a fit and refused to invest because of the elevated tax rates on capital gains and dividends.

I didn’t refuse, nor did others. I have worked with investors for 60 years and I have yet to see anyone — not even when capital gains rates were 39.9 percent in 1976-77 — shy away from a sensible investment because of the tax rate on the potential gain. People invest to make money, and potential taxes have never scared them off. And to those who argue that higher rates hurt job creation, I would note that a net of nearly 40 million jobs were added between 1980 and 2000. You know what’s happened since then: lower tax rates and far lower job creation.

Barbara Ehrenreich wrote an editorial for The Washington Post about the “demonization” of the uber-wealthy. One of the points she touched on was how to middle class america, the upper tax bracket seems woefully out of touch. She interviewed a crisis-management consultant in Washington named Eric Dezenhall, who talked about a “gazillionaire” client who didn’t think people would picket his house after he ran his company into the ground. “Because the super-rich live in a bubble,” Dezenhall said. “They’re concerned about what a small circle of peers think of them, like the guys they play golf with, but nobody else.”

With record unemployment, high foreclosure rates and millions of people struggling to make ends meet, no one is pitying Representative John Fleming for only having $400,000 left after taxes and “feeding his family.” How will he ever survive?

So, let’s follow Warren Buffet’s advice once again. Let’s remember that right now, the real job creators are small business owners. Perhaps we can give them a bit of a break, instead of the billionaires.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Moneybrawl – The Extinction of Subway, Bill O’Reilly & the Super Rich
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook

While the poor and middle class fight for us in Afghanistan, and while most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get our extraordinary tax breaks. Some of us are investment managers who earn billions from our daily labors but are allowed to classify our income as “carried interest,” thereby getting a bargain 15 percent tax rate. Others own stock index futures for 10 minutes and have 60 percent of their gain taxed at 15 percent, as if they’d been long-term investors.

These and other blessings are showered upon us by legislators in Washington who feel compelled to protect us, much as if we were spotted owls or some other endangered species. It’s nice to have friends in high places (Warren Buffet).

Don’t know much about history…

So, I think at this point that even people living under rocks know about Sarah Palin and her tale of Paul Revere. I’m not really going to talk about it. I don’t have an issue with it, except for the way she dug her heels in and insisted she was right. I also have issues with people trying to revise the wikipedia page. But NO. This is not about her. Enough has been written about her.

This is about the American flag. A symbol on many a lapel. I read an article on washingtonpost.com and it absolutely blew my mind. Think about everything you know about our flag. Guess what? It’s all wrong. The block quotes are from the article I linked to, you should check it out.

So, if someone asked you who made the American flag, you’d say Betsy Ross. Unless you’re that person from Jaywalking who said Diana Ross. However, apparently she didn’t make the American flag. She made flags in Philadelphia, just not ours.

As President Woodrow Wilson, who presided over the first official national Flag Day on June 14, 1916, is said to have replied when asked his thoughts on the story: “Would that it were true.”

Also, do you own anything with an American flag on it? Tsk tsk. Illegal.

The U.S. Flag Code frowns on the use of the flag “for advertising purposes.” It goes on to warn against the sale or display of any “article of merchandise . . . upon which shall have been printed, painted, attached, or otherwise placed a representation of” the flag to “advertise, call attention to, decorate, mark, or distinguish the article or substance on which so placed.”

Apparently it’s not enforced. I can only imagine if it were…

Did you know that the House of Representatives did not recite the pledge of allegiance on the floor until 1988? The Senate didn’t do it on a daily basis until 1999. Crazy.

Also, red, white and blue don’t symbolize sacrifice or anything like that. There’s no official reason given for why our flag is red, white and blue. It’s mostly likely that the flag is red, white and blue because the colonial flags were that color. And the British flag.

The article was written by Marc Leepson. He wrote a book called ‘Flag: An American Biography.’ I just marked the book as “to-read” on my Goodreads account. I love flags. I can name every flag in the world. Can you?

Throwing stones in glass houses…

I stumbled upon this interesting article today. China’s Foreign Ministry responded to the U.S. State Department’s criticism of their human rights record by basically telling us to mind our own business and take a look in the mirror.

An excerpt from the article:

“The United States ignores its own severe human rights problems, ardently promoting its so-called ‘human rights diplomacy’, treating human rights as a political tool to vilify other countries and to advance its own strategic interests,” said a passage from the Chinese report.

Produced by the State Council Information Office, the government’s public relations arm, the report dwelled on what it said were severe deprivations and threats facing many Americans, as well as Washington’s invasion of Iraq.

It also cited the United States’ refusal to ratify a number of international human rights pacts, and listed poverty, hunger and homelessness as stains on the country’s rights record.

“The United States is the world’s worst country for violent crimes,” said the report. “Citizens’ lives, property and personal safety do not receive the protection they should.”

“Racial discrimination is deeply rooted in the United States, permeating every aspect of social life,” it said.

It leaves me wondering…do they have a point? We have Guantanamo Bay. A recent poll showed that 46 percent of “hardcore Republicans” in Mississippi think that interracial marriage should be illegal. Gay marriage is illegal in the majority of our states. Then there is the resistance to signing human rights treaties that they cited. If you want to go back in time, we have the treatment of Native Americans, slavery and Jim Crow.

In spite of that, I think China wins in terms of human rights violations. Just saying. Can any country cast the first stone when it comes to human rights? Maybe Sweden or the Netherlands, but do they have the economic or military power to force a country like China to release political prisoners or allow freedom of religion?

Yes, we have some work to do in cleaning up our own human rights record. So do a lot of countries. However, what would happen if the United States didn’t try to use its political clout to curb human rights violations?

I don’t have any answers on this. I’ve just been thinking about it.

What do you think?

  • Tweets!